Page 4 of 5

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 30 Apr 2013 22:49
by RecklessMetal
If you make the nuetral pose that 4th model. I'd say its ready to be added O.o

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 01 May 2013 16:38
by Edeodin
Ugh sorry guys. There's a signal problem with my internet so it is incredibly unstable. Just attempting to upload a picture will cause it to cut out. But I managed to brute force it. Here's a Machamp with his arms up. I had this done yesterday morning but this is the first time I've gotten a picture to upload successfully...

Spoiler:
Image

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 01 May 2013 16:51
by MrMasochism
brilliant

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 01 May 2013 16:52
by Jumpyporcupine
Get a poll!

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 01 May 2013 17:20
by LightAdept
I like it, but should we animate the top arms at all? im thinking no, cause it everything i think of would look weird and probably would always be happening (not just during walking, for example). So i think we should just leave them stationary. But still, Very nice model, i cant wait to code him in and finally have the machop line done!

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 01 May 2013 17:40
by SPG
LightAdept wrote:I like it, but should we animate the top arms at all? im thinking no, cause it everything i think of would look weird and probably would always be happening (not just during walking, for example). So i think we should just leave them stationary. But still, Very nice model, i cant wait to code him in and finally have the machop line done!

Not going to lie, them not moving would look weird

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 01 May 2013 21:55
by Ledia
Nope, I'm agreeing with Light. I think the should remain stationary, at least for now, and the other two arms can swing naturally...

There just isn't any walk cycle animation I could put on that second pair that I can can think of that would look nice. Unless you had an actual suggestion to back your argument (complaining) SPG? :P

Did I mention I LOVE your models?!? You have a gift Edeodin, right up there with karry and Omerta <3

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 02 May 2013 02:38
by SubGenesis
How about they move in a way that is synced to the movement of the lower arms so that they both move in a similar gesture at the same time

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 02 May 2013 03:08
by PixelNerd2002
Looks great

Re: Machamp

PostPosted: 02 May 2013 05:45
by lugiaisbeast101
SubGenesis wrote:How about they move in a way that is synced to the movement of the lower arms so that they both move in a similar gesture at the same time


Yeah, do that but for all arms and just do another animation for walking and you're good. That seems like the best way.